The effectiveness of multimedia boards/projection systems in teaching humanities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.02.16

Keywords:

Digital technologies, humanities subjects, multimedia whiteboards, professional competence, projection systems

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to integrate digital technologies (multimedia boards/projection systems) into the training of specialists, in particular in the field of humanities, and the development of professional competencies through the use of modern multimedia tools. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of using multimedia whiteboards (MWBs) in building professional competencies among humanities students. The study employed methods of theoretical and methodological analysis, generalisation of studies, testing, questionnaire surveys, and work with interactive boards (including delimitation of space, selection of stickers, use of tags, and multimedia elements), among others. The study involved humanities students, particularly those majoring in Philology, Primary Education, and Pedagogy. The total number of participants was 300 students, who were divided into an experimental group (EG) of 150 students. And control (CG) of 150 students. All criteria underwent positive changes, especially in the aspects of practically-oriented skills (+30%), experience with information resources (+40%), and the level of communication skills (+25%). At the control stage of the study, statistically significant differences were found between the EG and CG in terms of the level of professional competence (φcrit = 1.64 < φemp = 2.418). The use of virtual boards significantly enhances students’ competence, fostering active interaction and the solution of practical tasks. The questionnaire survey revealed that multimedia technologies increase involvement, enhance motivation and improve understanding of the material (average score     4.17–4.28). Their flexibility in learning was rated the highest (4.28), and their personalised features were rated the lowest (3.99). Overall, their use has a positive impact on the educational process. The academic novelty lies in the use of MWBs for developing competence in the current digital educational environment. Further research may focus on the effectiveness of interactive technologies in other humanities subjects and their impact on professional training. The study has a quasi-experimental design, which involves the participation of experimental and control groups without randomisation, but with precise control of variables and comparison of educational outcomes. This approach enables a reasonable assessment of the effectiveness of using multimedia boards and projection systems in developing students' professional competence. The theoretical contribution of the study lies in the development and testing of a pedagogical model for integrating digital tools into humanities education, covering the principles of visualising complex concepts, developing interdisciplinary thinking, active interaction in a digital environment, and individualising learning. The proposed approach can be adapted to other areas of education, taking into account the specifics of subject training.

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Savitska, West Ukrainian National University, Ukraine.

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, West Ukrainian National University, Ukraine.

 

Nataliіa Matveieva, Vasyl Stefanyk Prykarpattia National University, Ukraine.

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Vasyl Stefanyk Prykarpattia National University, Ukraine.

Alexander Chinchoy, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State University, Ukraine.

Candidate of pedagogical sciences, Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State University, Ukraine.

Natalia Romanyshyna, Rivne State University of Humanities, Ukraine.

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Rivne State University of Humanities, Ukraine.

Yurii Sakh, The Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine.

The Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine.

References

Ali, S. (2022). The effectiveness of immersive technologies for future professional education. Futurity Education, 2(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.25

Alzubi, A. (2023). The role of multimedia tools in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan's education classroom teaching in the digital era. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 4(2), e02303. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/13378

Anggraini, R., & Handayani, Y. (2022). Digitalization in education. Journal of Digital Education, Communication, and Arts, 5(01), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30871/deca.v5i01.2942

Arguello Mogrovejo, M. T., & Vásquez Guerra, M. (2023). Efectividad de las pizarras digitales interactivas en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje: Un meta-análisis de estudios empíricos. Revista Científica Kosmos, 2(2), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.62943/rck.v2n2.2023.45

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292

Bakhmat, N., Sydoruk, L., Poberezhets, H., Misenyova, V., Boyarova, O., & Mazur, Y. (2023). Features of using the opportunities of the digital environment of the higher educational institution for the development of future economists’ professional competence. Economics Affairs, 68(1s). https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1s.2023.6

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). Harvard University Press. https://acortar.link/3VWwfo

Concha Abarca, J., Quispe Choque, M. E., & Quispe Choque, M. (2023). Importancia del uso de las herramientas digitales en la inclusión educativa. Horizontes. Revista De Investigación En Ciencias De La Educación, 7(29), 1374–1386. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v7i29.598

Córdova Lapo, R., & Lino Pérez, R. L. (2024). La Interactividad en el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje mediada por pizarras virtuales 2.0: Interactivity in the teaching and learning process mediated by virtual whiteboards 2.0. LATAM Revista Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales Y Humanidades, 5(6), 1030–1050. https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v5i6.3063

Devadze, A., Gechbaia, B., & Gvarishvili, N. (2022). Education of the future: an analysis of definitions (literary review). Futurity Education, 2(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED/2022.10.11.19

Filatova, L., & Drobina, A. (2021). Application of the multimedia technologies in the training of the future primary school teachers. Acta Paedagogica Volynienses, (3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.32782/apv/2021.3.23

Frumkina, A., Diachenko, M., Polyezhayev, Y., Savina, N., & Hadi, F. (2020). Readiness of future teachers for integrated teaching of educational subjects in foreign language. Revista Práxis Educacional, 16(38), 502-514. Retrieved from https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/praxis/article/view/6023

Gurantz, O., Pender, M., Mabel, Z., Larson C., & Bettinger, E. (2020). Virtual advising for high-achieving high school students. Economics of Education Review, 75. Retrieved from https://ogurantz.github.io/website/Gurantz_2020_VirtualAdvising_EconOfEd.pdf

Gurevych, R. S., Silveistr, A. M., & Мokliuk, M. O. (2020). Use of interactive bask on physics in pedagogical universities. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, 56, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2020-56-5-24

Hendawi, M., & Nosair, M. (2020). The efficiency of using the interactive smartboard in social studies to increase students’ achievement and tendency toward the subject matter in the state of Qatar. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.1

Humeniuk, T., & Romaniuk, P. (2023). On the development of information and communication technologies in education of the future: the possibilities of cloud computing technology. Futurity Education, 3(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2023.25.03.03

Khan, D., Rehman, I., Ullah, S., Ahmad, W., Cheng, Z., Jabeen, G., & Kato, H. (2019). A low-cost interactive writing board for primary education using distinct augmented reality markers. Sustainability, 11(20), 5720. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205720

Khrystiuk, S., & Tsymbal, S. V. (2023). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Implementing a Sustainable Development Strategy for Higher Education in Ukraine. Humanitarian Studios: Pedagogics, Psychology, Philosophy, 14(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.31548/hspedagog14(2).2023.99-106

Killian, T., & Floren, M. (2020). Exploring the relationship between pedagogy and counselor trainees' multicultural and social justice competence. Journal of Counselling and Development, 98(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12324

Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466

Krymets, L. (2022). What must the education of the future be like to be really future? (Attempts of philosophical reflection). Futurity Philosophy, 1(4), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.03

Lund, A., & Aagaard, T. (2020). Digitalization of teacher education. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 4(3-4), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3751

O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7

Poperechna, G. (2022). The analysis of the philosophical reflection on education of the future peculiarities. Futurity Philosophy, 1(3), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.09.30.03

Rajab, K. D. (2018). The effectiveness and potential of E-learning in war zones: An empirical comparison of face-to-face and online education in Saudi Arabia. IEEE Access, 6, 6783-6794. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2800164

Ritter, M. (2022). Digital Games in Primary School English Language Education. English Studies, 33(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.33675/angl/2022/1/6

Santoveña-Casal, S., & Fernández Pérez, M. D. (2020). Sustainable Distance Education: Comparison of Digital Pedagogical Models. Sustainability, 12(21), 9067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219067

Tang, X., Zainal, S.R.B.M., & Li, Q. (2023). Multimedia use and its impact on the effectiveness of educators: A technology acceptance model perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 923. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02458-4

Tight, M. (2022). Research into leadership in higher education: A systematic review. In: International perspectives on higher education research (pp. 5–22). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-362820220000015001

Vali, I. (2023). The impact of technology on collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference EDU WORLD 2022: Education Facing Contemporary World Issues (pp. 1-8). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23045.13

Velasteguí López, E. (2019). Las pizarras digitales y su impacto didáctico en la educación superior. Explorador Digital, 3(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v3i1.346

White, J. R., Yang, T., Muñoz, A. S., & Gao, M. (2023). Digital competence and teaching practices of language teachers in Sweden in a COVID-19 world. In: Digital education and learning (pp. 125–146). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12070-1_7

Williams, T. L., Walker, E., Ludlum, M., Edwards, M., & Gregory, K. (2023). Online Learning During the Covid Crisis: Student Views. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i2.5818

Wong, S. F., Mahmud M. M., & Yong, W. K. (2023). Learning in the margins: Student choice for digital and traditional whiteboards in in-person learning at university. In: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Educational Technologies and Society (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3637907.3637969

Zhao, K., Peng, C., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the teaching path of visual communication in the digital era. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 19(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.340937

Zhylin, M., Tormanova, A., Poplavska, Y., Chernov, M. M., & Druz, O. (2023). Study of digital approach in education and psychology among selected users in Ukraine. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 6. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2023spe007

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Savitska, V., Matveieva, N., Chinchoy, A., Romanyshyna, N., & Sakh, Y. (2025). The effectiveness of multimedia boards/projection systems in teaching humanities. Eduweb, 19(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.02.16

Issue

Section

Articles