Fomentar una identidad investigadora en la formación de futuros docentes en el Reino Unido
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2026.20.02.11Palabras clave:
investigación pedagógica, formación del profesorado, profesor-investigador, cultura de la investigación, I DResumen
Este artículo explora el desarrollo de la identidad del investigador en el contexto de la formación docente en el Reino Unido. En respuesta a las cambiantes exigencias del panorama educativo actual, el estudio analiza cómo la cultura investigadora del futuro docente se transforma de una habilidad opcional a una necesidad profesional fundamental. Un elemento central es el nexo investigación/docencia, que fomenta la transición de los métodos de instrucción tradicionales a un paradigma de desarrollo orientado a la investigación. Basándose en el modelo académico británico, el artículo examina la integración de competencias gnósticas, diagnósticas y reflexivas en los planes de estudio. Los hallazgos subrayan que fomentar la identidad del futuro docente investigador es un proceso multifacético que involucra componentes motivacionales-axiológicos, evaluativos-resultativos, procedimentales y prácticos. Elementos clave, como el uso de diarios reflexivos y módulos basados en la indagación, se identifican como fundamentales para desarrollar la autonomía del estudiante y la independencia metacognitiva. El fomento de las competencias de investigación en los planes de estudio de formación docente se define por la flexibilidad cognitiva y la generatividad. La flexibilidad cognitiva implica la adaptación didáctica de los planes de estudio para alinear las actividades de aprendizaje con los perfiles cognitivos de los estudiantes. Por su parte, la generatividad cognitiva refleja el potencial del plan de estudios para cultivar un intelecto creativo, fundamentado en marcos cognitivos basados en la indagación. El estudio concluye que, al priorizar la práctica basada, el modelo británico proporciona un marco para transformar a los futuros docentes de receptores pasivos de conocimiento en profesionales autónomos, creativos y resilientes.
Citas
Alexander, O., Argent, S., & Spencer, J. (2019). EAP Essentials: A teacher’s guide to principles and practice (2nd ed.). Reading. Garnet Publishing.
Bartosh, O., Danko, D., Kanyuk, O., Hodovanets, N., & Myhalyna, Z. (2023). Research-based learning in the education process of a higher education institution. Amazonia Investiga, 12(64), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.20
Bartosh, O. (2023). Ucraniano [Integration of research informed component in the training process of future specialists in higher education establishments]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: «Pedagogy. Social Work», 1(52), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.24144/2524-0609.2023.52.19-23
Boletín oficial del estado legislación consolidada. (2023). Ley Orgánica 2/2023, de 22 de marzo, del Sistema Universitario. Jefatura del Estado «BOE» núm. 70, de 23 de marzo de 2023 Referencia: BOE-A-2023-7500. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2023/BOE-A-2023-7500-consolidado.pdf
Byrne, N., & Butcher, Ch. (2020). An introduction to teaching in UK higher education. A guide for international and transnational teachers. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429197161
Chung, J. (2023). Research-informed teacher education, teacher autonomy and teacher agency: the example of Finland. London Review of Education, 21(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.21.1.13
Clark, T, & Hordosy, R. (2019). Undergraduate experiences of the research/teaching nexus across the whole student lifecycle. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 412−427. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1544123
Danish School of Education. (2026). Research at the Danish School of Education. https://dpu.au.dk/en/research
Department of Education. (2024a). Initial teacher training and early career framework (ITTECF). https://acortar.link/9QW0UA
Department of Education. (2024b). Teacher training school placements. https://getintoteaching.education.gov.uk/train-to-be-a-teacher/school-placements
Elliott, J. (2001). Making evidence-based practice educational. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095735
Ferreira T., & Cravino, J.P. (2022). Pedagogical training of teachers in Portuguese public higher education institutions. En EDULEARN22 Proceedings (pp. 3338–3346). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.0818
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. UK: Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/developingundergraduate_final_1568036694.pdf
Irish National Teachers’ Organisation (2026). Who we are. https://www.into.ie/about/
la Velle, L. (2024). Teacher-as-researcher: a foundational principle for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(3), 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2024.2361498
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin. Authentik.
Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6
Loughran, J., Keast, S., & Cooper, R. (2016). Pedagogical reasoning in teacher education. In J. Loughran and M.L. Hamilton. (Eds.). International handbook of teacher education (pp.387–421). Dordrecht: Springer Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_10
Murray, О., Campbell, A., Hextall, I., Hulme, M., Jones, M., Mahony, P., Menter, I., Procter, R., & Wall, K. (2009). Research and teacher education in the UK: Building capacity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.011
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Teaching and Learning International Survey. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/results-from-talis-2024_90df6235-en.html
Joseph-Richard, P., & Jessop, T. (2020). A phenomenographic study of research informed teaching through the eyes of Masters’ students. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 847−861. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1554640
Perron, B.E., Victor, B.G., Hiltz, B.S., & Ryan, J. (2020). Teaching note − data science in the MSW curriculum: Innovating training in statistics and research methods. Journal of Social Work Education, 58(1), 193−198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2020.1764891
Swedish Institute for Educational Research. (2026). About us. https://www.skolfi.se/other-languages/english/
Teaching Council of Ireland. (2026). Research Support Framework. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/professional-learning/research/research-support-framework/
Townsend, T. (2011). Searching high and searching low, searching east and searching west: Looking for trust in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.611017
University College London. (2021). The Core Content Framework and the fallacy of a teacher training ‘curriculum’. https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/ioe/2021/09/02/the-core-content-framework-and-the-fallacy-of-a-teacher-training-curriculum/
Universities Council for the Education of Teachers. (2019). Building research-informed teacher education communities: a UCET Framework. London: UCET. https://www.ucet.ac.uk/downloads/10989-Building-Research-Informed-Teacher-Education-Communities-%28July-2019%29.pdf
University of Lancashire. (2022–2026). UCLan twins with Ukrainian university. https://www.lancashire.ac.uk/news/uclan-twins-with-ukrainian-university
University of Southern Denmark (2026). Research at SDU. https://www.sdu.dk/en/forskning
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Olena Bartosh, Oleksandra Kanyuk, Daryna Stanko, Dana Danko, Iryna Kozubovska

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.













