Entornos digitales y desarrollo de la competencia comunicativa en la educación superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2026.20.03.23Palabras clave:
competencia comunicativa, entorno digital electrónico, entorno sociocultural de la educación superior, estudiantes, tecnologías digitales.Resumen
El artículo revela la visión social del espacio de la educación superior. Se muestra el papel de las tecnologías digitales modernas y el entorno digital electrónico en la educación superior para la formación de la competencia comunicativa intercultural de los estudiantes. El análisis de la competencia comunicativa de los estudiantes, realizado por nosotros en la etapa de determinación, mostró un nivel predominantemente bajo e insuficiente de desarrollo de la competencia descrita. Esto nos permitió fundamentar las condiciones pedagógicas, diseñar trabajos experimentales adicionales y desarrollar un sistema de apoyo metodológico para la formación de la competencia comunicativa de los estudiantes en el entorno sociocultural de la educación superior. Los resultados sobre la formación de los indicadores de competencia comunicativa de los estudiantes en la etapa de control indican una efectividad significativamente mayor del experimento formativo en el grupo experimental, donde casi la mitad de los estudiantes alcanzó un alto nivel de competencia comunicativa en todos los criterios identificados. En contraste, en el grupo de control, este indicador es solo una cuarta parte del número total de estudiantes. La efectividad del experimento formativo realizado se confirma mediante el análisis estadístico utilizando el criterio t de Student. Los resultados obtenidos nos permiten hablar de la implementación efectiva y necesaria de las condiciones y el sistema pedagógicos desarrollados para la formación de la competencia comunicativa de los estudiantes.
Citas
Al-Naabi, I. S. (2020). Is it worth flipping? The impact of flipped classroom on EFL students’ grammar. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n6p64
Bozkurt, A., & Stracke, C. M. (2023). The shift toward openness in education and the implications for learning ecosystems and ecologies. In D. Otto, G. Scharnberg, M. Kerres, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Distributed learning ecosystems: Concepts, resources, and repositories (pp. 31–46). Springer VS. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-38703-7_3
Castro Benavides, L. M., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/11/3291
Dai, D. W. (2024). Interactional competence for professional communication in intercultural contexts: Epistemology, analytic framework and pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 37(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2024.2349781
Dalsgaard, C., & Ryberg, T. (2023). A theoretical framework for digital learning spaces: Learning in individual spaces, working groups, communities of interest, and open connections. Research in Learning Technology, 31, 3084. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.3084
Ertay, Z., & Gilanlioglu, I. (2024). The development and validation of an intercultural communicative competence scale for students. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241252495
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. H. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19
Iswandari, Y. A., & Ardi, P. (2022). Intercultural communicative competence in EFL setting: A systematic review. rEFLections, 29(2), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v29i2.260249
Ivenz, P., & Reid, E. (2022). Development of students’ intercultural communicative competence via creating their own cultures. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 10(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2022-0006
Khasanah, U., & Anggoro, K. J. (2022). Accessible flipped classroom model for pronunciation instruction: Its effectiveness and students’ perception. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15111a
Kostikova, I., Chastnyk, O., Ptushka, A., Yazlovytska, O., & Dovzhenko, O. (2021). Digital technology implementation in students’ proficiency development for English listening. Amazonia Investiga, 10(48), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2021.48.12.4
Kostikova, I., Miasoiedova, S., Razumenko, T., Chernenko, A., & Pochuieva, O. (2019). Teaching English speaking for FCE: Using Facebook as a tool of instructional practice. Amazonia Investiga, 8(22), 719–727. https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/825/773
Kucherenko, I., Mamchur, L., Mamchur, Y., & Bidyuk, N. (2020). Technological principles of the formation of a pupil’s communicative competence. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1Sup1), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup1/227
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nyamekye, E., Sappor, P., & Sam, L. (2026). Communicative competence and emotion regulation as predictors of students’ entrepreneurial intentions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2026.2649596
OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2023_c74f03de-en.html
Otto, D., & Kerres, M. (2023). Distributed learning ecosystems in education: A guide to the debate. In D. Otto, G. Scharnberg, M. Kerres, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Distributed learning ecosystems: Concepts, resources, and repositories (pp. 13–30). Springer VS. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-38703-7_2
Palshkov, K., Yaromenko, O., Pilishek, S., Golinska, T., Batenko, H., Lushchan, T., & Kuchai, O. (2026). Gamification in higher education: An experimental study. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 18(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.66388/rrem/18.2/36
Putri, J. S., & Nurkhamidah, N. (2023). The implementation of flipped classroom to develop students’ reading skill. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v5i1.3509
Sandal, J.-U., Detsiuk, T., & Kholiavko, N. (2020). Developing foreign language communicative competence of engineering students within university extracurricular activities. Advanced Education, 7(14), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.192411
Trang, T. T. T., & Phuong, V. T. (2023). Needs analysis about intercultural communicative competence among undergraduate tourism students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(6), 2599–2620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-10012-1
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens—With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
Zhou, D., & Li, Q. (2025). The role of teacher–student developmental relationships in linking communicative language teaching and communicative competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1635428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1635428
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Inna Chervinska, Nataliia Kovalenko, Ivan Hainiuk, Oleksandra Budanova, Mykola Kurach

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.













