Preparation of students for studying in crisis situations
Palabras clave:means of anti-crisis communication, anti-crisis learning strategy, educational competencies in crisis situations, flexibility of learning activities, anti-crisis training programs.
The primary directions of the higher school’s educational activity are professional training, education seekers’ personal growth and self-affirmation, development of all participants’ intellectual potential in the educational process, spiritual enrichment, and moral, aesthetic and physical improvement. The process of socialization of the student’s personality continues even during crisis situations.
The purpose of the academic paper is to establish the main tendencies in preparing students for the educational process in crisis situations in the scientific literature and to clarify certain practical aspects of preparing higher education seekers to study in crisis situations. In the course of the research, the analytical-bibliographic method was used to study the scientific literature on the issues of training higher education seekers in crisis situations. Induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis of information, logical-linguistic methods, abstraction, and idealization were applied to study and process data. A questionnaire was conducted by the research authors in online mode to clarify certain aspects of training practically. Based on the research results, the primary theoretical aspects of the process of students’ training in crisis situations were studied, as well as the standpoints of education seekers and teachers of higher educational institutions regarding the key aspects of this issue were clarified.
Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M.D., Infante-Moro, J.C., & Ruipérez García, G. (2020). Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: global research trends. Sustainability, 12, 2107. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052107
Alan, S., Teodora, B., & Seda, E. (2020). Ever Failed, Try Again, Succeed Better: Results from a Randomized Educational Intervention on Grit. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1121–1162. https://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/research-paper/5555_Ever-Falied-Try-Again--Succeed-Better_Alan-Ertac-Boneva_March2016.pdf
Aljanazrah, A., Yerousis, G., Hamed, G., & Khlaif, Z.N. (2022). Digital transformation in times of crisis: Challenges, attitudes, opportunities and lessons learned from students’ and faculty members’ perspectives. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1047035
Barrot, J.S., Llenares, I.I., & Rosario, L.S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. Published online 2021 May 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
Bradshaw, C.P., Debnam, K.J., Kush, J.M., & Johnson, S.L. (2022). Planning for a Crisis, but Preparing for Every Day: What Predicts Schools' Preparedness to Respond to a School Safety Crisis? Frontiers in Communication. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.765336
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11, 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Bruggeman, B., Tondeur, J., Struyven, K., Pynoo, B., Garone, A., & Vanslambrouck, S. (2021). Experts speaking: crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 48, 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772
Costa, E., Baptista, M., & Dorotea, N. (2022). Supporting Schools in Times of Crisis: A Case of Partnerships and Networking with Schools by the Institute of Education at the University of Lisbon, University and School Collaborations during a Pandemic, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82159-3_14
Eaton, S., Chibry, N., Toye, M., & Rossi, S. (2019). Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0046-0
Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., & Guzzo, T. (2020). Online learning and emergency remote teaching: opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies, 10, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040086
Green, C., & Harrington, C. (2020). Student-centered learning: In principle and in practice. Lansing, Michigan Virtual.https://michiganvirtual.org/research/publications/student-centered-learning-in-principle-and-in-practice/
Gunasinghe, A., & Nanayakkara, S. (2021). Role of technology anxiety within UTAUT in understanding non-user adoption intentions to virtual learning environments: the state university lecturers’ perspective. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13, 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.115978
Helmy, R., Khourshed, N., Wahba, M., & Bary, A. (2020). Exploring critical success factors for public private partnership case study: The educational sector in Egypt. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 142. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Exploring-Critical-Success-Factors-for-Public-Case-Helmy-Khourshed/1ec59696e4764d2d07f5fdda09fbae862b05945b
Jin, H., Mikeska, J., Hokayem, H. & Mavronikolas, E. (2019). Toward coherence in curriculum, instruction, and assessment: A review of learning progression literature. Science Education, 103(5), 1206-1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21525
Khan, Z., Sivasubramaniam, S., Anand, P., & Hysaj, A. (2021). ‘e’-thinking teaching and assessment to uphold academic integrity: lessons learned from emergency distance learning. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s40979-021-00079-5
Londar, S. (2021). Analysis of the state and main approaches to the assessment of the quality of the provision of educational services by institutions of higher education of Ukraine: monograph. Kyiv: Ministry of education and science of Ukraine State Scientific Institute "Institute of Educational Analytics" https://iea.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Monografiya_Analiz-stanu_2021.pdf
Marey, R., & Magd, A. (2022). The Current Curriculum, Instructional, and Assessment Reforms in Egypt: The Experience and Lessons. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 7, 207–225. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-19-2400-2_13
Rawashdeh, A., Mohammed, E., Arab, A., Alara, M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and Disadvantages of Using e-Learning in University Education: Analyzing Students’ Perspectives. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1296879.pdf
Sandanayake, T.C. (2019). Promoting open educational resources-based blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0133-6
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post- Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Derechos de autor 2023 Tetiana Polukhtovych, Larysa Dzevitska, Nataliia Yermakova, Rostyslav Liashenko , Vitalii Dziamko
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.